Archives
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- November 2008
- February 2009
Tuesday, November 08, 2005
I had no idea that the OSBAR Bulletin was so contentious (although I suppose I should have expected it from a bunch of lawyers). Has anyone read these letters? There are some odd fucken practitioners in Oregon-fantastic! Check out the end of this letter to the bulletin from an attorney in Salem:
"I, for one, can only suppose that the framers of our Constitution would be shocked to learn that the federal government would someday criminalize what plants you can grow and consume on your own land. See Gonzalez v. Raich. Put that in your Constitutional pipe and smoke it, Mr. Adamson; you might yet see a penumbra."
Here's another one (on something I apparently missed out on) from a Portland practitioner:
"I must tell you that, if the bar is taking the position that soldiers should be forced to watch live gay sex shows while on duty, it's no wonder people are so upset (and it's no wonder that the soldiers are so disturbed). Perhaps the bar should reconsider this position."
"I, for one, can only suppose that the framers of our Constitution would be shocked to learn that the federal government would someday criminalize what plants you can grow and consume on your own land. See Gonzalez v. Raich. Put that in your Constitutional pipe and smoke it, Mr. Adamson; you might yet see a penumbra."
Here's another one (on something I apparently missed out on) from a Portland practitioner:
"I must tell you that, if the bar is taking the position that soldiers should be forced to watch live gay sex shows while on duty, it's no wonder people are so upset (and it's no wonder that the soldiers are so disturbed). Perhaps the bar should reconsider this position."
Comments:
Post a Comment